- Get hold of a long lens, 200mm with a 10mp camera seemed to be just good enough.
- Put on a tripod.
- Change to spot metering and meter on the moon itself.
- The earth's rotation seems to give noticable motion blur on exposures over 2/3 sec.
- When the moon was still visible and white, I set the camera to f5.6 and ISO100. The meter gave an exposure of 1/50 sec.
- For the images where it was red, I put the camera on manual and set it to 2/3 sec, f5.6 and ISO500.
- I then set the camera to self timer with a mirror lock up so that I could press the shutter release, let go, and then the mirror would go up and then a delay before the shutter opened so that I minimised shake.
- Finally, I opened the raw files in Photoshop, brightened up the red moon image and unsharp masked them all to crisp them up.
- Just as a side note, the originals were only double the size of these, literally about 300 pixels wide. If you have a lower resolution camera, you would need a longer lens, or a teleconverter.
--
Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks shes a photographer - Stewie Griffin
I'd save up and get a 70-200, having a f2.8 lens is so much nicer than an f5.6, unless you can get one with VR. Unfortunately the Nikon 70-300 VR is rubbish
So yeah, a 70-200; Sigma like Alfred's or Nikon like Jozef's. Either that or get an 18-200 VR like mine, no need for any other lens ever rly
--
Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks shes a photographer - Stewie Griffin
Daily Literature Deviations is a group that is dedicated to bringing literature to the forefront of the deviantArt community. We attempt to accomplish this by daily featuring Literature artists from around the community that deserve the recognition, but are not getting it. Each day we will feature 5 deviations from the Literature categories in a News Article.
In order to support the artists that we feature, we ask that you the news article as well as check out the individual pieces. We understand that each day you may not be able to check out each and every one of the pieces, everyone has their own things going on. We just ask that you make an attempt to help support the growing Literature community.
Although `DEVlANT joined our community only a year ago, he's made sure to make his mark in as many ways as possible. From extensive bug testing around the site, to heading up the now infamous #devBUG Group, Martin's always eager to get involved. His inquisitive mind and enthusiastic personality is reflected in every part of the community which he reaches out to. Always eager to bring suggestions and feedback to us in a positive way, `DEVlANT shows a maturity way beyond his years. It's with great pleasure that we award very first Deviousness of 2010 t... Read More
Comments
--
Richard
Blog: [link]
Twitter: [link]
- Get hold of a long lens, 200mm with a 10mp camera seemed to be just good enough.
- Put on a tripod.
- Change to spot metering and meter on the moon itself.
- The earth's rotation seems to give noticable motion blur on exposures over 2/3 sec.
- When the moon was still visible and white, I set the camera to f5.6 and ISO100. The meter gave an exposure of 1/50 sec.
- For the images where it was red, I put the camera on manual and set it to 2/3 sec, f5.6 and ISO500.
- I then set the camera to self timer with a mirror lock up so that I could press the shutter release, let go, and then the mirror would go up and then a delay before the shutter opened so that I minimised shake.
- Finally, I opened the raw files in Photoshop, brightened up the red moon image and unsharp masked them all to crisp them up.
- Just as a side note, the originals were only double the size of these, literally about 300 pixels wide. If you have a lower resolution camera, you would need a longer lens, or a teleconverter.
--
Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks shes a photographer
- Stewie Griffin
I noticed that rotation problem too, makes you wonder how fast we are rotating!
I'm looking into getting a 70-300mm lens, It's gonna be either Sigma APO, Tamron or Nikon ED. Any suggestions? Seems like Sigma is the best buy.
--
Richard
Blog: [link]
Twitter: [link]
This is the crap I took: [link]
--
Richard
Blog: [link]
Twitter: [link]
So yeah, a 70-200; Sigma like Alfred's or Nikon like Jozef's. Either that or get an 18-200 VR like mine, no need for any other lens ever rly
--
Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks shes a photographer
- Stewie Griffin
--
Oh that is so lame, every hot girl who can aim a camera thinks shes a photographer
- Stewie Griffin
--
Richard
Blog: [link]
Twitter: [link]
Previous Page12Next Page